<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: 10 Reasons (Other than SEO) Not to Build Your Website in Flash</title> <atom:link href="http://unstuckdigital.com/10-reasons-not-to-build-your-website-flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://unstuckdigital.com/10-reasons-not-to-build-your-website-flash/</link> <description>Creative Online Marketing for Small Business</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:28:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>By: Womantic14u</title><link>http://unstuckdigital.com/10-reasons-not-to-build-your-website-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-912</link> <dc:creator>Womantic14u</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 21:30:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unstuckdigital.com/?p=2221#comment-912</guid> <description>Great article!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike Tekula</title><link>http://unstuckdigital.com/10-reasons-not-to-build-your-website-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-427</link> <dc:creator>Mike Tekula</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:07:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unstuckdigital.com/?p=2221#comment-427</guid> <description>Thanks, Ed. I&#039;d agree with your &quot;make up&quot; description for most uses of Flash. But there are cases and uses where Flash is the best solution - YouTube, for example, would never have taken off as it did without Flash as the basis for its video technology. However, for general web structure I don&#039;t think Flash is the right technology, for all of the reasons in this post and then some.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Ed. I&#8217;d agree with your &#8220;make up&#8221; description for most uses of Flash. But there are cases and uses where Flash is the best solution &#8211; YouTube, for example, would never have taken off as it did without Flash as the basis for its video technology. However, for general web structure I don&#8217;t think Flash is the right technology, for all of the reasons in this post and then some.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Yasir</title><link>http://unstuckdigital.com/10-reasons-not-to-build-your-website-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-426</link> <dc:creator>Yasir</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:32:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unstuckdigital.com/?p=2221#comment-426</guid> <description>I totally agree with you :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ed Fry</title><link>http://unstuckdigital.com/10-reasons-not-to-build-your-website-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-425</link> <dc:creator>Ed Fry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:14:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unstuckdigital.com/?p=2221#comment-425</guid> <description>Your post is spot on; especially with the mobile computing and accessability needs. As an avid iPod touch user, I get frustrated with the lack of flash yes.. but nothing nearly as bad as entire glitzy flash websites that acheive very little.I&#039;d say flash is like make up; use a little to &#039;enhance&#039; features where necessary, but the &quot;make up&quot; shouldn&#039;t be the only substance there!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your post is spot on; especially with the mobile computing and accessability needs. As an avid iPod touch user, I get frustrated with the lack of flash yes.. but nothing nearly as bad as entire glitzy flash websites that acheive very little.</p><p>I&#8217;d say flash is like make up; use a little to &#8216;enhance&#8217; features where necessary, but the &#8220;make up&#8221; shouldn&#8217;t be the only substance there!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike Tekula</title><link>http://unstuckdigital.com/10-reasons-not-to-build-your-website-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-424</link> <dc:creator>Mike Tekula</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:36:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unstuckdigital.com/?p=2221#comment-424</guid> <description>@Boca SEO - Agreed. I fell into that trap early myself. Flash can be really impressive. But it has plenty of down-side as well. Important to consider everything upfront. Glad you liked the post - thanks for commenting!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Boca SEO &#8211; Agreed. I fell into that trap early myself. Flash can be really impressive. But it has plenty of down-side as well. Important to consider everything upfront. Glad you liked the post &#8211; thanks for commenting!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/16 queries in 0.029 seconds using disk

Served from: unstuckdigital.com @ 2010-09-08 11:03:18 -->