<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: 11 Usability Mistakes SEOs Make</title> <atom:link href="http://unstuckdigital.com/11-usability-mistakes-seos-make/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://unstuckdigital.com/11-usability-mistakes-seos-make/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:51:32 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Mike Tekula</title><link>http://unstuckdigital.com/11-usability-mistakes-seos-make/comment-page-1/#comment-707</link> <dc:creator>Mike Tekula</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:53:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unstuckdigital.com/?p=3066#comment-707</guid> <description>@Luke Thanks for the kind words.It&#039;s tough calling people out on their missteps - the response is often less than grateful.I like your post - total agreement. Your site design isn&#039;t half bad either. Nice work.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Luke Thanks for the kind words.</p><p>It&#8217;s tough calling people out on their missteps &#8211; the response is often less than grateful.</p><p>I like your post &#8211; total agreement. Your site design isn&#8217;t half bad either. Nice work.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Luke Jones</title><link>http://unstuckdigital.com/11-usability-mistakes-seos-make/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link> <dc:creator>Luke Jones</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:51:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unstuckdigital.com/?p=3066#comment-705</guid> <description>I can&#039;t explain to you how much I love this post. It shames me to say this, but a few people I know make the mistakes quite often and I haven&#039;t got the guts to tell them they&#039;re doing it wrong. I&#039;ve got a terrible feeling that by doing that, they&#039;ll think I&#039;m undermining them... In reality, I&#039;m just trying to do what&#039;s best for their clients.Your point one comes at a great time actually, I&#039;ve just written an article called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.traxor-designs.com/seo/writing-copy-for-rankings-is-wrong/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Writing your copy with rankings in mind? You&#039;re doing it wrong.&lt;/a&gt; which is all about why you shouldn&#039;t write your copy with things like keyword density in mind...I&#039;ve subscribed to your feed too, just going through all of your old articles whilst I have what seems to be the worst headache ever. Hopefully it should chill me out a bit (is that sad?).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t explain to you how much I love this post. It shames me to say this, but a few people I know make the mistakes quite often and I haven&#8217;t got the guts to tell them they&#8217;re doing it wrong. I&#8217;ve got a terrible feeling that by doing that, they&#8217;ll think I&#8217;m undermining them&#8230; In reality, I&#8217;m just trying to do what&#8217;s best for their clients.</p><p>Your point one comes at a great time actually, I&#8217;ve just written an article called <a
href="http://www.traxor-designs.com/seo/writing-copy-for-rankings-is-wrong/" rel="nofollow">Writing your copy with rankings in mind? You&#8217;re doing it wrong.</a> which is all about why you shouldn&#8217;t write your copy with things like keyword density in mind&#8230;</p><p>I&#8217;ve subscribed to your feed too, just going through all of your old articles whilst I have what seems to be the worst headache ever. Hopefully it should chill me out a bit (is that sad?).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike Tekula</title><link>http://unstuckdigital.com/11-usability-mistakes-seos-make/comment-page-1/#comment-702</link> <dc:creator>Mike Tekula</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:19:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unstuckdigital.com/?p=3066#comment-702</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;@Jordon&lt;/strong&gt; - You&#039;re right, but with such a young and unregulated industry there are far more rookies out there than veterans. I&#039;ve also seen some big marketing/advertising companies making these mistakes.&lt;strong&gt;@goodnewscowboy&lt;/strong&gt; Thanks. I agree there is some similarity between points 2 &amp; 10, but I was trying to focus #2 on navigation/interactive elements and #10 on general content/infographics.&lt;strong&gt;@IgniteMedia&lt;/strong&gt; It sounds like you may be more referring to PPC traffic - with PPC you almost always want to isolate your landing pages (and prevent them from being indexed organically) - mainly to prevent the convolution of your data. Still, your question about what happens when the user navigates to another page and can&#039;t get back is a good one - if the user breaks out of the conversion path it can throw their experience. There&#039;s no easy answer, really - but asking the question is the first step towards a plausible solution.There&#039;s also pressure on SEOs to work within a given set of deliverables and justify their services/sales. It&#039;s an unfortunate reality of the business world that service providers move over to win-lose thinking if their short-term revenue is at stake.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Jordon</strong> &#8211; You&#8217;re right, but with such a young and unregulated industry there are far more rookies out there than veterans. I&#8217;ve also seen some big marketing/advertising companies making these mistakes.</p><p><strong>@goodnewscowboy</strong> Thanks. I agree there is some similarity between points 2 &#038; 10, but I was trying to focus #2 on navigation/interactive elements and #10 on general content/infographics.</p><p><strong>@IgniteMedia</strong> It sounds like you may be more referring to PPC traffic &#8211; with PPC you almost always want to isolate your landing pages (and prevent them from being indexed organically) &#8211; mainly to prevent the convolution of your data. Still, your question about what happens when the user navigates to another page and can&#8217;t get back is a good one &#8211; if the user breaks out of the conversion path it can throw their experience. There&#8217;s no easy answer, really &#8211; but asking the question is the first step towards a plausible solution.</p><p>There&#8217;s also pressure on SEOs to work within a given set of deliverables and justify their services/sales. It&#8217;s an unfortunate reality of the business world that service providers move over to win-lose thinking if their short-term revenue is at stake.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: IgniteMedia</title><link>http://unstuckdigital.com/11-usability-mistakes-seos-make/comment-page-1/#comment-701</link> <dc:creator>IgniteMedia</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:46:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unstuckdigital.com/?p=3066#comment-701</guid> <description>#11) Adding “SEO pages” that do nothing but target keywordsThis is the problem I have with keyword specific landing pages and usability. I think making sure the landing page relates to the ad and the phrase they typed in is good, but from a usability standpoint what happens if that person clicks to another page and can&#039;t get back to the landing page? I mean most landing pages aren&#039;t linked from other pages on the site because they are meant specifically for CPC, or a targeted marketing campaign.Just a frustration I have. Good post though, not sure I agree it&#039;s only the Rookie&#039;s that make these mistakes as Jordon mentions. I think sometimes even the well intentioned forget to look up from their &quot;work&quot; to see how it looks as a whole.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#11) Adding “SEO pages” that do nothing but target keywords</p><p>This is the problem I have with keyword specific landing pages and usability. I think making sure the landing page relates to the ad and the phrase they typed in is good, but from a usability standpoint what happens if that person clicks to another page and can&#8217;t get back to the landing page? I mean most landing pages aren&#8217;t linked from other pages on the site because they are meant specifically for CPC, or a targeted marketing campaign.</p><p>Just a frustration I have. Good post though, not sure I agree it&#8217;s only the Rookie&#8217;s that make these mistakes as Jordon mentions. I think sometimes even the well intentioned forget to look up from their &#8220;work&#8221; to see how it looks as a whole.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: goodnewscowboy</title><link>http://unstuckdigital.com/11-usability-mistakes-seos-make/comment-page-1/#comment-700</link> <dc:creator>goodnewscowboy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:29:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://unstuckdigital.com/?p=3066#comment-700</guid> <description>Nice list Mike. You&#039;re spot on with every point (although pts 2 &amp;10 seemed similar).Also loved the &quot;squeezed off a round into your own foot&quot; and hit on both cylinders&quot; analogies.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice list Mike. You&#8217;re spot on with every point (although pts 2 &amp;10 seemed similar).</p><p>Also loved the &#8220;squeezed off a round into your own foot&#8221; and hit on both cylinders&#8221; analogies.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 15/25 queries in 0.029 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: unstuckdigital.com @ 2012-02-03 23:08:39 -->
